The challenge was Carlos Sainz: the Spaniard bet his team-mate Fernando Alonso in the 2nd reboot in Melbourne. For the Aston Martin star, this had no effects due to another demolition. The stewards punished Sainz for the nasty with an additional 5 seconds on the race time. Due to the fact that the field crossed the goal behind the security automobile, the Ferrari driver dropped from 5th to twelfth– and was extremely dissatisfied.
Expected service: Article 14.1.1 of the Sports Law specifies that “if the circumstance modifications, the race authorities worried ought to reunite to hear the pertinent info”. This can occur as much as 14 days after the occasion.
Ferrari wished to revive Carlos Sainz’s charge at the Australian GP, however it came a cropper.
Photo: Ferrari
Ferrari saw an opportunity to get points and thought they had brand-new proof that might make Australian commissioners Enrique Bernoldi (Brazil), Nish Shetty (Singapore), Loic Bacquelaine (Belgium) and Christopher McMahon (Australia) reevaluate.
It’s simply silly: the management saw it totally in a different way and nipped Ferrari’s objection in the bud. Factor: “There are no brand-new essential or substantial aspects that were not present when the very first judgment was provided. Ferrari’s objection is overthrown.
.
